MPR_2026v16n4

Medicinal Plant Research 2026, Vol.16, No.4, 283-295 http://hortherbpublisher.com/index.php/mpr 293 advantages in active compound accumulation and ecological characteristics. However, neither mode has absolute superiority, as quality formation is influenced by cultivation environment, evaluation indicators, and plant developmental stage. Therefore, differentiated development strategies should be adopted: facility cultivation should focus on large-scale, standardized, and functional-product supply, whereas wild-simulated cultivation should target quality-oriented, high-value, and ecologically distinctive products. Future development of the D. officinale industry should emphasize the integration of advantages from both cultivation modes rather than expanding either system independently. A composite production strategy, such as “facility-based seedling propagation combined with ecological cultivation for quality improvement,” can effectively combine production efficiency with medicinal quality enhancement. Meanwhile, precision environmental regulation, green cultivation technologies, and intelligent management should be further applied to improve production stability and quality consistency. In addition, quality evaluation systems should move beyond reliance on a single polysaccharide indicator and develop comprehensive evaluation frameworks incorporating polysaccharides, flavonoids, alkaloids, metabolomic characteristics, and bioactivity-related parameters. By improving germplasm management, production standards, and quality traceability systems, the D. officinale industry can achieve sustainable development characterized by high quality, high efficiency, and ecological compatibility. Conflict of Interest Disclosure The author affirms that this research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. References Chen Q., Zhang C., Chen Y., Wang C., and Lai Z., 2024, Transcriptomic analysis for diurnal temperature differences reveals gene-regulation-network response to accumulation of bioactive ingredients of protocorm-like bodies in Dendrobium officinale, Plants, 13(6): 874. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13060874 Chen W., Wu J., Li X.F., Lu J., Wu W., Sun Y.Q., Zhu B., and Qin L., 2021, Isolation, structural properties, bioactivities of polysaccharides fromDendrobium officinale Kimura et Migo: a review, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 184: 1000-1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.06.156 Cheng J., Chen Y., Dong J., Jiang J., Fu C., Huang X., Zhou J., Jiang C., Wang X., and Liang L., 2026, Cultivation mode reshapes root fungal endophyte communities in Dendrobium officinale (Orchidaceae), Diversity, 18(6): 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/d18060359 Cheng J., Dang P.P., Zhao Z., Yuan L.C., Zhou Z.H., Wolf D., and Luo Y.B., 2019, An assessment of the Chinese medicinal Dendrobiumindustry: supply, demand and sustainability, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 229: 81-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2018.09.001 Ding J.T., Tu H.Y., Zang Z., Huang M., and Zhou S.J., 2018, Precise control and prediction of the greenhouse growth environment of Dendrobium candidum, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 151: 453-459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.06.037 Duan H., Er-Bu A., Dongzhi Z., Xie H., Ye B., and He J., 2022, Alkaloids from Dendrobium and their biosynthetic pathway, biological activity and total synthesis, Phytomedicine, 102: 154132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154132 Gao M., Huang S., Yang T., Tian S., He L., Wang A.Q., and Zhang S., 2026, Physiological and transcriptomic analysis reveal responses of two different phenotypes of Dendrobium officinale to high temperature and drought stress, Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 232: 111188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2026.111188 Gu C., Zhang X., Wu L., Jiang X., and Huang L., 2017, Quality evaluation of Dendrobium based on ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) and chemometrics, Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science, 7(1): 17-23. https://doi.org/10.7324/JAPS.2017.70103 Guo X., Zhang S., Yan T., Yuan G., Dai Y., Dong L., and Wang Z., 2021, Comparative analysis of nutritional quality of Dendrobium officinale Kimura et Migo after transplantation of artificially cultivated plants from South to North China during different growing years, Research Square, preprint: rs-521625/v1. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-521625/v1 He Q., Lu A., Qin L., Zhang Q., Lu Y., Yang Z., Tan D., and He Y., 2022, An UPLC-Q-TOF/MS-based analysis of the differential composition of Dendrobium officinale in different regions, Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry, 2022(1): 8026410. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8026410 Hu L., Wang S., Zhang L., Shang L., Zong R., Li J., Wu Z., Meng Y., Dai Y., Huang Y., and Wei G., 2024, Wild imitating vs greenhouse cultivated Dendrobium huoshanense: chemical quality differences, PLOS ONE, 19(1): e0291376. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291376

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjQ4ODYzNA==