Genomics and Applied Biology 2024, Vol.15, No.6, 296-306 http://bioscipublisher.com/index.php/gab 298 varieties have been observed to adopt strategies such as faster transition into the reproductive stage to avoid the most severe drought periods, thereby mitigating the adverse effects on flowering and pod formation (Buezo etal., 2018). Figure 1 Comparative analysis of gene expression and pathways in drought-sensitive soybean cultivar BR 16 under water-deficit conditions (Adapted from Molinari et al., 2021) Image caption: (A) Genetic ontology analysis of DEG identified in flower (R2 developmental stage) and pods (R4 developmental stage) of drought-sensitive soybeancultivar BR 16 subjected to water-deficit conditions. Data include both expression profiles, up and down-regulated genes. Green bars represent genes associatedwith GO terms identified in pods and purple ones in flowers. Positive and negative numbers associated with the bars, stand for up and down-regulated expressionprofiles of genes associated with the respective GO term category. (B). Drought-responsive pathways affected by WD condition in soybean cv. BR16. Legend: Bluecircles stand for up-regulation and red ones for down-regulation. (C). Comparison of expression analysis performed using RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR techniques forgenes differentially expressed in flower and pod of drought-sensitive soybean cultivar BR 16 subjected to WD treatment compared to C condition. JOURNAL OF PLANT INTERACTIONS 193 (Adopted from Molinari et al., 2021)
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjQ4ODYzMg==